Intro Approach Review # Title Author Year Series Rating

I discovered long ago that I like writing reviews. After reading a book, I like putting down in writing my thoughts and evaluation of the story. Organizing and re-organizing those thoughts, figuring out what I liked or didn’t like about the book, analyzing which parts “worked” for me and which ones didn’t. A personal reading journal, so to speak. But I also discovered that I like sharing that review with others. Sometimes they respond and share their views; other times, they read my reviews and it helps them make a decision to read (or not read!) a story. I don’t try to make the decision for them, I just give them information based on an impartial yet personal review of the story.

These two elements together — writing the notes, sharing the reviews — mean that I take them seriously. I’m not a “paid professional” reviewer, but I try to do reviews as professionally as I can. Which leads me to what I think of as my first and only duty as a reviewer:

Write a personal review that will help other readers figure out if the books would be of interest to them.

From this duty, I have derived my approach to writing book reviews. 

  1. Reviews will never be anonymous…If I write the words, my name goes with it. Good or bad, any review should be attributable.
  2. Reviews will be honest and unbiased but respectful…it does no one any good for a review to be false. If I read it, I review it, and will not agree to “only review it if it is a 4 or 5-star result”. Nor will I falsely praise / promote it just because I want to help the author. My duty is primarily to be honest with the reader, but I will also honour a duty to the author that the review will be unbiased and it will not try to trash their work. I will also give full disclosure. If I have any relationship with the author, I will disclose it, ranging from receiving a free copy to review to following them on social media or being friends with them. I’ll also disclose if it is a genre that I don’t normally read. Other than a complimentary copy of a book, I will not accept any compensation for writing a review. Finally, I will review the book, not the author. While reviews may take into account other books in the genre, or even other books by the author particularly if it’s part of a series, the reviews should not be biased by information about the author or the publisher. The book must stand or fall on its own merit.
  3. Give my opinion, not consensus…Each review will be based on the conclusion I have come to while reading the book. While I may take into account the blurbs on the book, the promotional material presented, etc. as to the “aim/purpose” of the book, or even look at other reviews to see if I need to explain better how/why my views differ, the opinions are mine and mine alone. Equally, a review is meant to be my opinion of the book, not a summary of the text with spoilers nor a technical critique. Nevertheless, there are certain elements that I consider fair game in any review. Rarely should all of them be considered, of course, but here is my occasional list: choice of title; readability; character and their development; realistic portrayals of plot, theme and people; point of view; genre; pacing; plot development; tone and style; dialogue; setting; timelessness; gaps; clarity of presentation or backstory; satisfaction with ending; and other items that might be relevant to that work.
  4. Books will be reviewed in context…I will review chick lit books against other chick lit books; mystery stories against other mystery stories. I will not review the latest mystery against the great works of fiction of the past in other genres — so, this means that a supposed great work of classic fiction might end up with a lower rating (against other great works of fiction) than the latest chick lit (against other chick lit books). Context matters, as most books are not aiming to be the latest and greatest literary masterpiece.
  5. Reviews will include my rating…I would be far more comfortable providing a rating out of ten or even twenty, rather than five. But all the major sites use five-point scales, and sub-points are not allowed. With that in mind, I will use the following scale: 
    • Rating of 1 — I finished it, but I don’t recommend it;
    • Rating of 2 — Not bad, certainly readable;
    • Rating of 3 — Good, worth reading but some noticeable issues;
    • Rating of 4 — Thoroughly enjoyed it, with minor issues;
    • Rating of 5 — Excellent.

That’s it, that’s my approach to reviews. I hope you enjoy reading them as much as I enjoy writing them, or at least that the review helps you figure out if a book or story is one that you might enjoy or want to avoid. 

signature_01


Print pagePDF pageEmail page
Share

Comments

Book Reviews – Approach — 3 Comments

  1. From Lindsey B: That’s definitely a meaty list, but I’ll bet it gives you a good guideline for putting together consistently quality reviews. I’m sure readers will appreciate your thoroughness!

  2. Thanks to some feedback I got from a listserve discussion, I added to the “disclosure” clause above that I will identify if it is a genre that I don’t usually read and/or don’t usually enjoy. I suspect that will be rare, as if it isn’t something that interests me, I probably won’t read it in the first place! For example, I rarely enjoy horror so that is probably out, as is historical romance. Most of my reads will likely either be classic literature (part of a personal challenge to myself), mystery / crime fiction, or science fiction.

    There was also a great debate on another discussion forum about only posting elsewhere if it was a “4.00 or 5.00” star review. The argument was that you weren’t helping authors if you posted less than that. I can’t imagine a concept more offensive to me as a reviewer to say “only post glowing reviews” or “only 5 stars”. If I read it, I review it; if I review it, I rate it. There are no other factors in there that can / should / would influence the outcome. I don’t care if it is a book by my wife even, I’m honestly going to read and rate it.

    As for my “duty to authors”, I’m not a PR person. I’m not their agent. I’m not their editor, publisher, midwife, lover or third-grade teacher. I’m reviewing the book — my primary duty is to the reader, not the author. And, even if there is a “secondary” duty to the author, those obligations are already met by (a) being impartial; (b) being honest but respectful; and (c) considering the book on its merits. After that, my duty (such as it is) to the author is done.

    PolyWogg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *